2000-11-29 - 10:18:54

this is my seven-year-old question that still seems to validate itself at twists and turns throughout my adult life: what do you do when someone is making a decision which you think is a disaster? the information you've got is fairly subjective which is always a little on the down side but knowing someone for some extended amount of time is certainly an advantage in being aware and cognizant of things which count. blind support (A.K.A. "trust") is so petty and amounts to very little. stupid stupid trust what an ambiguous and selfish concept which allows people to be silenced and deplicated so easily from bonds which appear to be meaningful!

i don't trust my actions i calculate them. at the same time there is faith involved. (so obviously i'm not evolved enough.. heh, heh.. "hey adam when ya gonna catch up on the enlightened reason scale?") but there's also this funny thing called history which for people who have critical faculties to allow some objectivity in decision making. this both reminds me that i need to catch up on my french revolution events as well as my childhood.

micro macro micro macro micro macro micro macro